Monday, 5 November 2018

A story for Bonfire Night (as promised)



The short story below is unusual in that I do not, as a rule, publicise or post (as here) any of my written work - meaning stories, prose, even poems. Why? Well, I suppose that this is going to sound big-headed, but it's because I think my stories are worth stealing ... or at least some of the plots or ideas in them. - But I am also cocky enough to think that, oh well, if I lose one or two here and there - so what? I have a deep cavernous brain - there's more knocking around in there. The only worry is ... how long will my brain function well for? - And, of course, how long will I be around for at all?

OK - 'I takes me chances' ...

So here you are folks - a short story for Bonfire Night written over the last couple of days and vaguely edited, so this is, I guess maybe a second or third draft - so not a masterpiece but worthy of a read, I hope. It's actually L O N G for me as my short stories are normally around 1k to 2k words, but this is quite a bit more.

A footnote before you read and wonder about paragraphing: when copying and pasting from a WORD document into a Blog-post the line breaks disappear - so paragraphs look odd but I am too lazy to go through the (below) 3.5 k words to tidy it up - its the message that matters.

Happy reading:



The Last Bonfire Guest

By Tim J Rhohn-Sayers
(A short story in 3,687 words)



The damp twigs and leaves hissed with their delicate steamy vapour as the flames clung to life.
“We should have got more dry timber Harry. Give us a beer mate.”
Harry and John were both Australians and they met in The Outback when working at a sheep station twenty years ago. Now in their forties. they shared a grubby run-down Victorian terraced house in Fulham, London with three other Aussies. This was the only way they could survive financially in London. Only one of the five had a proper job; that was “Twiggy”, a skinny bloke from Melbourne who worked in I.T. the others got by as best they could in ‘the gig economy’ doing anything that came along.
“I wish the others could’ve come, don’t you?” said John, looking down at the dirt and ash by his feet.”
“Ah, here we go; girls – a load of ‘em by the looks of it.”
Harry always liked the girls – more than John – not that John was gay or anything but they were so different with John being so shy, still, even after years of ribbing in The Outback, still he wouldn’t say boo to a goose. They were good friends and always looked out for each other. This was the first time they’d ever been out in the countryside like this, miles from the metropolis, thanks to someone’s chance remark.
Harry had overheard someone at work saying that she was going to a bonfire party out in the sticks somewhere. He’d listened carefully. Sounded good, he thought. He knew the girl, Rachel, fairly well – even gone on a date with her once but it never went anywhere.
Harry was never lost for it; cheek, that is. He waited until he gleaned all the facts, thought about the date, Saturday November 5th., the location, bloody Lincolnshire – a place he knew nothing of but what he did like was the idea of camping out. He and John both had tents they’d crazily brought all the way from Oz – big buggers – they’d all fit in, and, with a bit of luck, Harry had thought. - So would a few girls too.
It was an old school friend of Rachel’s that was throwing this bonfire party. “Bring a few fireworks, some booze, a bit of tucker and a box of matches and the rest we’ll make up as we go along guys.” – That’s what Rachel’s friend, Mandy had said when agreeing to invite the boys from Oz. “The more the merrier. Just make sure that you can find the place. We’re like the outback, but up near a castle,” she said. Mandy was a good sport. They’d met her a couple of times before, in London, when she had been staying with Rachel but at heart Mandy was a country girl, grown up on a farm, watched all the animals doing it and she wasn’t’ afraid to say she liked the boys – all the boys and she wasn’t afraid to show ‘em either. She lived with a bloke, Tom, but they seemed to be more like roommates. – Lived in the same cottage, slept in the same bed, ate together but didn’t seem bothered if either went off with someone else occasionally.
As the flames grew stronger and higher, more guests appeared, all looking ‘dead cool’ and a real mixed bunch. Some sounded posh, well-spoken, well kitted-out, carrying spotless cool boxes, and those daft fold-up seats, like they were going to a forest concert or something. Others arrived smoking joints and carrying crates of beer, “fucking this and fucking that and fucking the other” – but nobody seemed to mind who was who or how they got there or who they were friends with. In fact, it was a lovely open and free atmosphere.
By now the Aussies were joined by a dozen strangers, but acting like friends and a few people actually bothered to introduce themselves – others sat slightly apart and chatting to their little band of bruvvers as there were certainly more fellas than girls – which might be a problem, Harry thought.
It was made clear to all guests that nobody got into the house, nobody was sleeping there and the only exception was to use the little attached but outside loo around the back of the sweet little thatched cottage. Oh, that was the other thing – no rockets – afraid that the thatch might go up, one supposes.
This place was called Harlaxton and, luckily for all concerned was near a main line station, Grantham, so nobody needed to worry about cars or driving, although a few cars did arrive, spilling out another five or six people, again, mostly blokes Suddenly the noise of a powerful motor bike was heard coming up the winding drive, but it turned out to be a trike and amazingly who was on it? Three bloody girls in leather. Harry was riveted and they weren’t half bad, he thought.
“John, see that – mine’s the blonde, yours can be the bloody ginger one.”
“Harry, that’s what’s called auburn, mate – she ain’t ginger.”
Out of the trike’s boot – yes it had a boot – came two cases of Stella.
The girls, all three of them, immediately sat next to Harry and John, with John edging away as the third girl sat partially on his right leg, he wondered whether intentionally. They were all on a rickety old bench which groaned and creaked and threatened to collapse at every slight movement.
The music started playing. It promised to be an evening of rock but then, after protests from a couple of young girls, some Radio One stuff started. The drinks were shared out unselfconsciously, regardless of who came with them and so John and Harry shared their Fosters around about but most declined, preferring, in most cases, something stronger. Even the few older people were drinking scotch like it was going out of fashion (which it had of course). People started getting up. A few danced garishly – others clinched seductively and nobody knew if they’d only just met but things were moving at a pace.
The headlights of a large car appeared down the nearby lane and then they shone towards the cottage as the car drew into the drive and the gravel gave out sudden noises like the sea rushing over shingle as it arrived just beyond the bonfire in the moon shadows of the overhanging trees.
“Bloody hell Harry, it’s a Rolls Royce – a new one.”
A large driver’s door opened and an immaculately turned-out chauffeuse, in scissor sharp pressed navy blue tightly fitted and pleated trousers and oddly wearing a bright red beret slid her slender, trousered legs out sideways. Her delicate ankles showing above, again, bright red, high-heeled shoes and Harry’s and even John’s eyes popped for a moment at this rather ‘stimulating’ sight.
Then, all eyes swivelled in the direction of the car’s rear door as it was swishly opened by the chauffeuse.
It turned out that this gleaming 16 plate ‘Roller’ was carrying the last guest to arrive at the party but we only knew that later, when we were discussing the events of that evening and overnight, 5th. and 6th. November 2016 and that was over brunch on the Sunday morning.
John returned to the tent after queueing for the small outside toilet. It was 10 a.m. and the smell of frying bacon hung in the air and conflicting sounds of variously tuned radios criss-crossed the misty atmosphere between the scattering of a dozen or so tents and a few campervans dotted about the large garden.
John had not noticed anything odd when he had slid out of the large 6-man tent en route to the loo. Harry was somewhere under a pile of coats and sleeping bags; well at least, so John thought. As he re-entered the tent a noise emitted from under the covers. It was human, certainly. Then very white flesh appeared in contrast against the damp grass in the corner of the tent. Delicate toes, slim, too slim to be Harry’s, emerged as the covers parted a little. Then part of the leg, still white-looking.
“Harry?” came from what was obviously a female human.
“No, it’s John. I don’t know where he is. I thought it was him under the covers.”
Her face, white neck and long brown hair appeared above the sleeping bag. She was beautiful, John thought. His mind was filled with thoughts of what Harry had got up to the previous night. He couldn’t even remember going to bed and certainly couldn’t remember Harry bringing someone ‘home’ – but where was he and who was she?
He made small-talk for a short while, made more awkward not having no clue as to who she was. – This was a ‘first’ for shy John and gradually he became aware that she was kind of saying that Harry had suggested that she use his sleeping bag and his corner of the tent – with me fast asleep – on the other side. – All very confusing. Still John wanted to know where Harry was. John found his mind wandering a little, wondering what, of anything, she was wearing underneath the sleeping bag. He could see enough of her to know that she wasn’t wearing a bra but she seemed relaxed and either had forgotten her lack of clothing or just didn’t care and he began to think of a third possibility which he found somewhat arousing, that she might be teasing him.
John sat, fully clothed on a little fold-up stool near the zipped-up tent entrance whilst she, still nameless, sat diagonally across from him. It was cold both inside and outside and she was now visibly shivering.
“I’m sorry it’s so cold for you – here have my sleeping bag as well.”
“No; I’ll get dressed.”
Those words resonated in John’s mind instantly. He thought that if she needed to get dressed that she must be … and he vaguely hoped for … un-dressed and before he could ponder a second longer she threw back the covers and tucked her long legs under her bottom and catapulted herself to full height which John assessed quickly as being approaching six foot but his gaze was lower down than her full height as she was, shockingly, near-naked, except for a bracelet and a skimpy pair of thong type pants. He was stunned at her uninhibited exhibition but then as she turned, he noticed too, a tattoo on her exposed buttock – a butterfly and some vague thoughts and recollections came fluttering back to him… but not enough.
Suddenly the tent zip opened and Harry’s face appeared in the opening.
“All OK here, guys and gals?”
The nameless girl grabbed a throw and pulled it across her body and bare breasts, in shame and John reflected on the fact that she was happy to be half-naked in front of him but not in front of Harry – further proof, as if he needed it, that it was he, not Harry who had slept with her last night, but he, infuriatingly, had zero recollection of any of it except the butterfly seemed teasingly to be triggering vague memories of something, but what exactly – he knew not.
Harry grinned broadly, not taking his eyes off the mystery girl.
“Well say something, somebody”, Harry added.
John was embarrassed for a host of reasons:
He had no idea who this girl was but he vaguely remembered her buttock butterfly from the night before – or was it the night before? – He wasn’t sure. He had no idea too, how Harry ended up sleeping somewhere else, where he’d been, with whom and what was presenting itself, that he’d slept with a stranger, with his shyness, was almost unthinkable. He did know that they’d all had a vast amount to drink and some had had more than alcohol too, but that wasn’t his style, or maybe he’d got carried away as well.
The whole thing was a serious test for his equilibrium – his well-being.
The silence was broken from an unlikely source.
“You must be Harry. I’m Rosalind Harper. You, Harry, at least, may recognise me.”
She stared at John as she spoke in a rather ticking-off manner. John felt even more stupid. He had slept with her and he didn’t recognise her or her name.
“I’m sorry Rosalind but I don’t. Why should I?” Harry looked awkward and John knew him so very well that he understood exactly why he felt uncomfortable. Harry had had a reputation with women for years and everyone knew what he was like. Harry simply feared that she was one of his forgotten conquests from way back. She wasn’t.
“You’re my brother.”
John knew that Harry had a long-lost sister; he’d spoken of her years ago but they hadn’t spoken or seen each other for almost a decade. He waited for Harry’s reaction to this bombshell.
“Then you’re Rosie, not Rosalind. What are you talking about?”
“I married a man called Harper and he hated the name, Rosie, so he renamed me Rosalind and then we called our brand leader perfume Rosalind. He’s gone but the name had to stay – so I am Rosalind – get used to it.”
Harry looked incredulous. For once in his life he was speechless. He had tears rolling down his cheeks. It was all too much. His sister turns up, after all these years but in ‘the bed’ of his shy best mate, John. - Too much to take in.
At last he summoned enough composure to speak. “Rosie, why now?”
There was not a moment’s hesitation when she burst out …
“Dad’s dead.” She said it in fury as if he had let her down by dying, rather than in grief.
John knew that Harry’s parents separated and then divorced years ago. His dad had returned to England in 2008 and his mother had remarried in Oz. His sister Rosie had gone with the father whereas Harry had stayed with his mum and later, step-dad. Harry hadn’t seen his father for years.
Harry wiped the tears from his face and asked “how did you and John …” He broke off, not knowing the words to use.
“How did we what?”
“End up in bed together – it’s not something John does.”
“Whatever gave you the idea that we slept together?”
“Well, it was obvious, wasn’t it? You were almost naked when I opened the tent zip.”
Rosalind laughed out of joy and ridicule of her brother. She knew what a ridiculous farce this situation had grown into but all she was thinking about right now was how honest she dared be, about herself, and her life as it was now.
“Let’s take this back a few notches, little brother …
… D’you recall a lovely purple Rolls Royce arriving late last night with two lovely women in it, when all the eyes swivelled from first the chauffeuse and then to the leggy woman that emerged from the rear seats?”
“Yes, of course I do - so?”
“Well”, she emphasised … “Little, think you’re so clever, brother – the leggy one was me, only you didn’t recognise me with my clothes off, did you?”
John stayed quiet, looking down at his feet, waiting for more from her.
“The girl driving was my girl. I mean my lover”. She laid heavy emphasis on the word, lover. “– Has been for three years now and we’re very happy, thank you. She looks after me … protects me … from men like you … and from …” She broke off. She had tears rolling down her left cheek and her voice was cracking.
“What’s wrong? What is it? – So why did you sleep with John?”
“I didn’t fucking sleep with him you juvenile idiot pervert – you just thought I did and even he seemed to think that I did”.
“After Dad died last week I’ve had so much to do – finding you – arranging for him – sorting our company out. I was at my wits end by the time we drove into this Godforsaken primitive backwater. I just hit the bottle last night – everyone here did – I was out of my brains – still am probably.”
“I still don’t get it Rosie – what made you sleep with him?”
“How many times do I have to tell you – I did not sleep with him.”
“You ended-up naked in our tent.”
“Half-naked maybe – not with him though – in the other sleeping bag. I slept the other side of the tent and when I ended-up in there it was with supposed to be with Butterfly – my wife-to-be.”
“What?” He elongated every sound of the word in sheer disbelief of her explanation.
“Butterfly is her pet name. She calls me Wasp – she has a wasp on her bum – I have a butterfly on mine. We’re in love, John – we’re getting married – you can come.”
John suppressed a near giggle at that whilst she wiped the tears now flowing from both eyes and she sniffled and clenched her eyelids together for a moment as she drew a deep sigh.
“When I fell asleep, well collapsed really I thought I was with Butterfly – she’s Elaine really but we always use our pet names. John won’t remember but he said as you weren’t there, he would get out and we could have the tent but Butterfly went and got him back and she said she’d sleep in the car – she’s an angel – selfless.”
Harry interrupted …
“What d’you mean we could have the tent. Does he know about you two? How?”
“Yes, he’s knows more than you do. I tried to contact you but he took the call on your phone – I don’t know where you were. He was supposed to tell you everything but then he phoned back and said he couldn’t do it. He didn’t want you to hear about dad from him – so he kept quiet and I knew I had to do it all – but yes – he knew about Elaine and I. He also knows about the money.”
“Money? What money – what are you talking about?”
“Never mind about that – I still can’t think how I didn’t realise that John was there in the tent – God knows what he must think of me – I just thought it was B under the other covers when I stood up – shit – bare tits – hell – poor man.”
“No, bloody lucky man.” – As soon as he said it – he knew it was a dreadful thing to say.
“Yes, that’s what I mean – she protects me against you filthy-minded male chauvinists – thank God.”
“Come on – what’s this about money?”
“Later … let me get dressed properly – oh here’s B.”
“Did you sleep OK sweetie? The car was a bit cramped even with the seat back but the mini-bar was useful for knocking me out, darling. – Morning … John … isn’t it or are you Harry?”
John thought that she looked as though she had just come from a high-class beauty salon – immaculate skin, perfect nails, eyes, make-up, no tired lines, clothes as though she had just bought them at Harrods, smelling sweetly too – no doubt wearing “Rosalind” perfume … John mused on. - Missing red beret though. He wondered why.
“Can we all have breakfast, please?” At least Butterfly was calm, sensible and not a drama-queen, John, thought.
The four of them wandered down to the bottom of the garden where a plume of steamy smoke suggested a breakfast barbecue was in full swing. They sat on two of the many blankets that were strewn around from last night’s activities. Wasp and Butterfly sat together, holding hands and John and Harry looked on slightly awkwardly.
Rosalind spoke first. “You better be nice to me. I have some news for you.” Harry just stared at her in resignation but he had no idea of what was coming, but John did and his slight smile gave a clue.
“Father had a small but very successful scent business that he’d started with our mum way back in Oz even before we came along.” Harry knew about it but he never knew much as his mother always seemed reluctant to discuss the business and that was because her husband had effectively stolen it from her when he moved to London and set-up home with a new woman.
“That small business turned into a leading fashion and perfume house and dad became a millionaire. Mum got nothing. You got nothing but I got invited into the business a few years ago and I promoted the perfume side, hence our leading brand “Rosalind” that you’ll see in all the best places from Harrods to Prada. I am rich, dad was rich and now little brother, so are you.”
“How?”
“There’s a trust set-up. You and even mum, get an allowance, every year.”
“How much?”
“A lot.”
John had stayed quiet all this time, chewing burnt bacon sandwich and he had had enough of all this protracted mystique. He interjected …
“You’re a bloody millionaire Harry – you get £500 k a year for two consecutive years. Your mum gets a lump sum of a million. Guilt money I would guess.”
This would prove to be a very memorable Guy Fawkes night after the last bonfire night guest fluttered by but there was a sting in the tail of this waspish tale …
Rosie got nothing. Her father had changed his will after Rosie had announced that she was marrying Elaine. He didn’t believe in gay marriage – or any marriage, really. He was a clever man though. He stated in his will that if she married a man within six months of his death, she would be entitled to a one-off payment of one million pounds, just like her mother.
Elaine and Rosie had a pact. They knew where they stood. Elaine would wait for Rosie to marry – a man, then divorce and then they could be together as spouses. and the dead father couldn’t do a thing about it.
The first move on this was with John, in the tent.
Three months later shy John and manipulative Rosalind married. Harry, mum, Elaine and another forty-five guests were there to witness the meeting of the conditions of the will.
The final twist?
They never divorced. Poor Butterfly.


Sunday, 4 November 2018

A recap and fuller explanation (of what this blog is about)



Good morning crowing creepy Crowd (of one).

OK, that sounds a little cynical and a little unself-confident. For all I know there could be thousands of you out there (in the ether) soaking up all these words of wisdom and I doubt any of you are "creepy" but I do love alliteration and I preferred creepy to crazy or crawly or Crawley.

Concentrate, Tim - tell them what you want to say and stop faffing around ...

Well, for a start, this is a novelty, sitting here as I had previously for so many early mornings, over months of ill-health, tapping away - but there's been a gap, whilst I got somewhat better and slept through the night. Despite that good news, I missed my enjoyably isolated hours alone tapping away on the large-screen laptop waiting for it to BSD [Blue Screen of Death]. I seem, mostly to have solved that technical issue which one would hope I could after many years in I.T.

I think it is time to re-explain what this blog is all about or at least what I think it is all about:

  • It's not themed (particularly) but I don't think, at least, that it is what one of my sons describes as my "brain dump" which in some ways is a good phrase but in others rather crude perhaps.
  • Those observant visitors to this blog would have noticed some time back that the URL (the web address) is different from the header or title (well, subtly different) and that's because for a while I was using my blog also to advertise some items for sale and the address of: Best Seller Before I Die? smacked of me being a salesman rather than a writer. Thus the title ended up as Best Selling Author Before I Die?
  • It was intended to be a companion to my writing and thus focused on my writing but it morphed a bit into something that started to have a mind of its own and I was just the instrument (the typist). I suppose it was my mind producing the posts but sometimes it felt rather as though I was the servant of someone else. I certainly had a job to type as quickly as (whoever) was churning-out the prose or post content.
  • So, it can still live up to being primarily about my writing; but only just by a short head, to use an equestrian term.
  • In the background, frankly, I guess unknown to blog readers, I am writing, if, as ever, not as regularly as I should. I have a primary book about half-written and a few others at various stages of completion. I also have a plethora of short stories, almost all completed and I plan to amalgamate them into one or more anthologies in due course.
  • In conclusion, I suppose this blog has become something between a diary of events, my opinions, some news or current affairs or just things that I am interested in. Obviously one hopes that others may share my interest.
Today, as I used to, I awoke early (4.30 a.m.) and the improving so-called frozen shoulder hurt a bit, along with the fact that I seem to have 'put my back out'. I think the latter is from shock rather than any overwork as I had neglected domesticity (home DIY tasks) for so long that when I returned to doing my bit my body made some kind of protest.

It's almost Bonfire night and I miss my many bonfires that I had in our farmyard (usually accompanied by a bottle of ale). We have to get by with just a large oil drum incinerator on the go now as the former concrete area (for bonfires and horse poo) was grassed over and a new well-placed poo pile area was built. There's something very lovely about bonfires:

  • The smell and how it gets in your clothes. The best smells being from burning damp leaves.
  • The warmth.
  • The differing flickering flames of various colours depending on what infiltrations there were in the items burning.
  • The ever-changing shadows caused by the flames.
  • The emotions generated by that camp-fire notion that suggests, even alone, one has the company of many camp followers that are joining in with the beer-supping and imaginary banter.
Time to write a short story and post it - just so anyone out there knows that I write ...

Thursday, 25 October 2018

Nevis - what is it? Where is it? Contemplating one's Nevis?

This is a late post and thus is rather late news too - but news it was - to me ...

What has Nevis and John Cleese got in Common?

Firstly, Nevis is an island - read about it in glowing terms here.

That trusted treasure, John Cleese, by the time you read this (if that's after November 2018), should be living, he suggests, permanently there.

See what he has to say about it all with one of my favourite BBC people, Emily Maitliss (below) but, sadly, for me, our trusted treasure, he comes across (at least on this occasion) as a bumbling (whatever that is) old, large-stomached, tight-trousered, mic-discarding, clipboard-carrying, self-important (note his distraction and disgust at a cameraman's chat when he is in full flow) twat ...

... Such a pity ...

Let's hope he enjoys his new (hopefully long) life in The Caribbean.


Wednesday, 24 October 2018

Bugzy Malone and Rag'n'Bone Man perform Run on Later... with Jools Holland


I always tend to miss the midweek Jools (Later) but by a fluke caught it successfully and the first item was Bugzy Malone (like I knew who the hell that was) and the guy with the amazing voice (I of course recognised the voice but not the new look) was Rag 'n' Bone Man. We used to have one of those come around our streets in Dulwich, South London in the sixties. He had a horse and cart and a bell.

I am 69 years old. I am NOT supposed to love this rappy, hip-hoppy music … but I do!



No doubt my peers will hate it, which rather makes me like it somewhat more.

Love it love it love it!

The thing I have always liked about rapping type music is not only the rapid, punchy beat and rhythm but also and in particular the social commentary made by the lyrics. The lyrics are not always 'pure' because they have to fit into the space that the music permits but the message is always there. Important not to be too critical of the precise words - just get the message put over in the words and typically they're about deprived youngsters trying to keep their heads above water when drowning in peer pressure to join gangs and go-nowhere street life.

As a young boy growing up in South London I got an idea of the developing social scene which then, in the 1950s was nothing like the dangerous scene that can envelope young people in big cities these days. My life was twice 'elevated' (to enlighten me) when at about 12 years old I was sent to boarding school in Hertfordshire and then, many years later in my early thirties I was sponsored onto the London Blue Badge Guide (tourism) course and I started 'rubbing shoulders' with the middle classes and sometimes the wives and partners even of the aristocracy. I gained a taste for a different life and lifestyle. I discovered 'culture'.

The above video has these lyrics (below) and I won't bother to track down and post the lyrics to the other track  but they are findable of course, if you are interested. I say this to my readers: if you are inclined against this kind of music, maybe have no time for the rapping and hip-hop music genre, at least understand from whence it came and reflect.

LYRICS:



Want to know what a Wiz Khalifa is? It's a "he" - see here and maybe listen and watch here too.

Then tripped over this too - Bugzy Malone and JP Cooper perform Ordinary People:


Saturday, 20 October 2018

The Kinks (for those of you that remember this great band).


This is actually old news in that my wife and I had a great evening a month ago in Lincoln's New Theatre Royal with what's left (I thought, at least) of The original Kinks band and they call themselves The Kast Off Kinks but their renditions were as good as the big hits of the 1960s and 70s.


Not only are they calling themselves The Kast Off Kinks, but trying to establish, for me, who is who, and what is going on with The Kinks, seems too, to be cast in shadows.

For a start, the very distinctive face of the guy I remembered as the original band's lead singer (of whom I never remembered his name, but research tells me that it is Ray Davies) - I thought as he was not on stage in Lincoln, that maybe he was dead - but it turns out - he isn't. So that creates a mystery for me.

Glastonbury:
So, after, as ever, a bit of Googling around, I find that in 2010 (still with that distinctive face - and looking good, he, Ray Davies was singing the great hit and my personal favourite, "WATERLOO SUNSET" that, I, as a South Londoner, can never hear without being cast into deep emotional, nostalgic and thoughtful wanderings of the mind, reminiscing about my regular 'work walks' across the bridge when I worked just off Fetter Lane, within the diamond industry, on the north bank of The Thames near the legal [Inns of Court] and newspaper [Fleet Street] hearts of London). He was singing (with a good voice still) at Glastonbury with a massive supporting choir. Here it is (below):




At the time of the Glastonbury Festival in 2010 when Ray Davies played Waterloo Sunset, it was shortly after an original band member, Pete Quaife (bassist) had passed away and thus Davies dedicates his song to Pete and below is a poor video recording of Davies appearing at a memorial event for his former band colleague when to be honest he reveals that he sings better than he speaks publicly in my view (I hope that you can successfully comprehend what Davies is saying as I had difficulty myself):




Once you've seen the video above, now let me tell you how the plot thickens. I am speaking as a fan of The Kinks, not an aficionado, meaning I loved 'em but knew not much about them, either then, in the 1960s and 70s, nor now. What seems to be the reason for the feud that I intimated earlier is made a little clearer in a Telegraph article here.

During my roaming around The Net for research etc., I tripped over a young woman busking nearby Waterloo in London - uploaded to YouTube. - Worth hearing her singing Waterloo Sunset - got a good voice (and I love the violin backing and the acoustic guitar). Her name's Charlotte Campbell.




I suppose you should see and hear the band doing Waterloo Sunset live at The BBC in 1968 as a comparison to all the other versions:


I am always an emotional wreck when anything South London comes up as my life was in such turmoil when I grew up there into my adolescence and beyond. Thus, I was interested what gave The Kinks the idea of Waterloo Sunset. Here is the answer and within the exposé is the original soundtrack of their recorded single of Waterloo Sunset - which is far better than the live one.

Update 23-10-18:

If you Google around for The Kinks you'll find a surprising amount of interviews and biographical titbits about the band (as I have). I was tempted to add some of these (mostly YouTube items here as an extra section, but I think that this post is already very long and not every visitor will be a Kinks fan - so to summarise:

If you want more biographical information visit these items (and be aware that one or two marked with an asterisk are quite long time-wise:

Finally, finally, finally ...

You have to visit this website which gives a thorough and oh so interesting tour around North London in respect of The Kinks and the two brothers, Ray & Dave Davies. This is NOT to be missed.

Wednesday, 17 October 2018

The latest on health.



I'm only doing this as I am sitting here at just past 3 a.m. (again) after a period when I was managing to go through the night without significant sleep disturbance. The last couple of nights I have been back on the routine (as it was a month or so ago) of awaking at any time between 1.30 a.m. and 4.30 a.m. and failing, despite trying, to get back to sleep. I emphasise - I'm not an insomniac - although in fairness, because of my desire to write, I do find myself inclined to want to get up - just to write but generally I have never suffered from insomnia. What is causing my sleep disturbance is now, thank goodness, mild pain in my still frozen left shoulder, thus meaning that I cannot find a comfortable position to drop-off again.



Right now at 3.45 a.m. I am wide awake - just like in the normal daytime. I have made caffeinated Darjeeling tea (without a second thought) and a toasted bacon and tomato sandwich with brown sauce - to boot. Why? Because I refuse to get depressed or miserable about this ridiculous health issue that has befallen me. I'm not that old - am I? Isn't 69 the new 50? What have I got to worry about? Lovely 'ancient' cat somewhere around (he's just been out and back again, safely - whereas most of our gorgeous cats died variously usually at a young age but all from road accidents where motorists failed to act as I do whenever I drive and at all costs avoid wild and tame animals - I suspect that here little regard is paid to cats). "Eccles - where are you? Come on have a cuddle my friend." I've just given him a kiss and a cuddle and he's purring nicely. I removed his bright orange collar (which we only put on him when he goes out, as it tends to wear away his fur). He's a lovely 16 year old boy and we wonder if we should (again) get a kitten as 'back-up' for when he goes. He's unaccepting of any male cats and not keen on adult females either - all of which results in his spraying around the house in protest - so it's a difficult decision but I worry about when he goes (our great survivor) - we'll be devastated.

Well this is a strange health update that spends a paragraph talking about loved ones of the furry persuasion.

Health Update (at last):

  1. Still have a frozen shoulder after about 4 months but it's improving in that I rarely get pain (except as explained sometimes at night). Movement is still restricted but better than it was.
  2. I am having a third MRI this Friday (today being Wednesday 17th.) at Louth Hospital and I'm in trouble if the people ask what area of my body is to be MRI'd as I won't know (shoulder- backbone - whatever?).
  3. I await an appointment for nerve testing (whatever that is).
  4. In conclusion - its a slow process getting over this stuff.
The thing that does concern me is feeling tired all the time - even after a sleep. Well - enough of this!

Tuesday, 16 October 2018

I'm going to write another book - Work in progress (a reference in prep)

Good morning my imaginary friends (Mifs and never to be confused with Milfs which is entirely different) - swarming, as ever, around my blog, in impressive uncoupled numbers, even prime numbers so appropriate for prime people!

Here is Tim again, back into his old ways, typing away at "silly o'clock" but this time it's only partly because his aches and pains are playing-up (no I know, you're sick of hearing that stuff - so this won't even appear under the "Health" label).

So what's this all about? I hear you say Mifs.

I'm going to write another book.

I know what you're thinking - "another book" - where or what are the earlier ones? Well there are ones - yes - they sit around filed ready for publication to the highest bidder, once bidding starts. Apparently that is how real proper authors do it - they are so good that publishers clamber to get the rights to those author's books. Wow! Yes, I know also that the use of "real proper" is poor English but you know what I mean.

Anyway - enough of the blabber ...

I'm going to write a book about where I live (for those new Mifs, I should explain) - that's Lincolnshire - an obscure northern place described by my daughter as The Other Side Of The Moon, but then she lives 'down south' and all that goes with it.

I am aware that my work (authorship that is) is so good and in demand that I am taking a hell of a chance using my blog as a reference tool. Yes you're right - you're getting the hang of my humour (well I call it humour). Just assume that I am trying to be funny and you won't go far wrong. Trouble is, particularly up here, in The Frozen North and indeed in my own family circles most 'dipper-inners' are not properly geared-up for humour that one might call "dry humour". Stick with it, and me, dipper-inners and Mifs.

So a little more explanation is called for I think:

I am going to use my posts on my blog (entirely publicly available of course - ready for my ideas to be unashamedly stolen by the mass of visiting competitive authors looking for great ideas - like mine) as my own ad hoc reference point. How will this work (I'm working on that as I type)? I think that I will randomly (it has to be that way as I am right-brained - i.e. more creative than organised) put stuff hereabouts which I will then pull together off-line (meaning away from The Blog) and compile my book. I am a little reticent, actually, to telling you, my public (Mifs that is) what the book is about because it has a market and thus is worthy of theft. Visitors will inevitably grasp what the book is going to be about, the more they visit but I suppose, once I get a pattern, and a habit going, of content for the book, if I'm wise I'll stop putting stuff "out there" (on The Blog).

So today I am staring with a map (OS [Ordnance Survey] has kindly allowed me to reproduce it here as my blog is currently not a money making project). Why a map? Because I want anyone from other places (outside Lincolnshire that is) to know where the county is in relationship to some other places - like even London for example.


Yes, I know, it's not a great map and not very clear but it'll do for now.

The point of this map is to highlight aspects as follows (in no particular order):

  • Lincolnshire is a large county (was even larger until North Lincolnshire and North-East Lincolnshire were created as separate administrative areas).
  • It is about four or five times the size of Greater London and is due north of it.
  • Lincolnshire population is about 1.75 million compared to Greater London being estimated to be approaching 9 million in 2018.
  • Just looking at these stats one can see that Lincolnshire (as if you didn't know it) is a largely rural county and comparatively sparsely populated.
  • The cost of housing and indeed living in Lincolnshire is very low indeed compared, for example, to London or any major city.
  • An average house price in Lincolnshire is about £150K, being about a quarter of the average house price in London.
  • There are property hotspots (being significantly more expensive) in Lincolnshire (attributable mostly to having better rail links to London) and they are at Grantham (west of county) and Stamford (south west of county). Woodhall Spa is somewhat 'up and coming' too but with poor commuting (no longer any rail service) which inhibits price inflation.
  • What do people say or think about Lincolnshire? There are some interesting and funny comments on Mum's Net here 
  • Why is Lincolnshire so cheap? - That's the million dollar question that I am going to provide an answer for (in due course).

Thursday, 11 October 2018

Film - THE WIFE with Glenn Close (seen in Cleethorpes 10-10-18)

THE WIFE trailer below:



My wife was cool about this film, but I loved it but I could see that it would mostly be found boring but to me this highly conversational, low action movie was a psychological masterpiece and rang so true to life I thought.

I'd give it 8 out of 10 but be patient and concentrate on all the nuances in this unusual film.

Day out in the sunshine on the Yorkshire coast.

Robin Hood's Bay - Yorkshire coast.

It's rare of late for us to actually plan a day out but the forecast was excellent and we both missed our days out and we'd not had one for months. We'd had visits here and there but not longer distance whole days out.

We almost always go south, maybe around The Wash and often into Norfolk, so I thought going north might make a change and the Yorkshire weather forecast was as good as anywhere in The UK. I always got a kick out of crossing The Humber Bridge with my Humber Tag, so we could speed along without stopping at the toll booths - always a 'sad' thrill for me - so easily pleased.

So, Wednesday October 10th. we set off for Robin Hood's Bay (RHB) - a place I'd only read about but heard favourable reports of.

I had a rather full on day outlined in my mind as RHB was just south of Whitby (which we love - so there was always a chance that we'd do Whitby as well, except that, to us, no Whitby trip was complete without fish and chips and a North Sea boat trip). Bizarrely we were to end-up with an entirely fishy day, starting with kippers for breakfast, smoked salmon and cucumber sandwiches for an early lunch and Cleethorpes fish and chips about 6.30 p.m.

We selected the so-named "short route" on SatNav for our return which was noted, weirdly,  as about 5 miles longer than the "fastest route" and went through Bridlington where we actually did what old people do - we sat on a bench in gardens overlooking the crashing waves, drank the last of the coffee and afterwards continued our journey via Beverley in thick town traffic (just about the time and place a fatal crash of a light aircraft occurred (as we heard the next day). Late afternoon, we intentionally dropped by our friend who'd just had a knee replacement operation at St Hugh's private Hospital in Grimsby, We missed the early early evening film show in Cleethorpes being a provisional idea, so we went for a drink at a pub full of atmosphere, on the prom' in Cleethorpes, met an older man walking the coast and as a last effort, saw a film , "The Wife" with Glenn Close (see my review post) at the exceptionally late time of almost 9 p.m.

The cinema staff must have been annoyed - we were the only customers and we only bought tickets two minutes before the start. I made a few rude suggestions about what we could get up to in this empty screen cinema, not particularly appreciated, I think.

I loved the film but my wife thought it mediocre. I thought how it wouldn't be too difficult for the key male character to be me and the main female one to be my wife. He was a writer, she a long-suffering supporter.

We got home, exhausted, about midnight.

RHB was a delightful place and we'll visit again.

(Own photos and video to follow soon.)

Saturday, 6 October 2018

Those we loved when it was too late including Freddie Mercury (Queen), Robin Williams and Amy Winehouse

When I did my last post (just an hour or two ago) it made me think about people we lose - famous people. I have a terrible habit of just getting into people (their style or performances) immediately after the inconsiderate people 'pop-off'. Some indeed cast their own demise like poor Robin Williams and Amy Winehouse.

So here's a bit of a tribute to these three at least ...

Firstly, FREDDIE MERCURY of QUEEN:

This One Show semi-documentary tells us a bit more about Freddie's background etc.:



Then there's the sad loss of Amy Winehouse. Here she is singing one of my (now) favourite songs of hers "Love is a Losing Game" (not a true statement necessarily but boy is it painful when it becomes a true statement as I know only too well). When she was alive, I hardly knew of her - certainly nothing she ever did attracted my attention - so what the hell was I doing? She's amazing and now she'll never be around to do more. Such a waste! Why didn't anyone see it coming and stop her - console her - poor woman.



I had always loved Robin Williams - in films, on TV but most of all when he was being interviewed, with that razor-sharp wit of his. - Again what a sad waste of life.

See what you think of this (in two parts but I am only showing the first):

Montserrat Caballé, Barcelona opera singer, dies at 85

Of course we've already lost Freddie Mercury and now he's followed by his co-performer of Barcelona. I love most opera but I admit, other than her famous performance with Freddie (of Queen) - I'd never really heard of Montserrat Caballé but you couldn't help but be impressed by her voice. She had a stereotypical appearance for an opera singer and yet that large size did not seem to limit her longevity particularly which was fortunate, as she died aged 85.

Below is what many of us associate her with:




I am looking forward to seeing the new film out shortly about Queen. Here's the trailer:


Good luck Rosie

Our friend is away soon for a few days. When she returns she'll be 'a new woman' - or at least part of her will be.

This is to wish you good luck from the author of this blog!


Onward, upward, reach for the clouds!

For our friend Nick Price - something else very French - Edith Piaf

This is for you Nick (who lived in France and was once married to a 'native') to engage you a little whilst missing your loving 'new' wife whilst she is away for a few days.

This is not a well-produced film but it does go some way to telling us all about the tragic life of one Edith Piaf who, a bit like the recently departed Charles Aznavour - was something of a French national treasure - some would say - The French National Treasure (who died in 1963). We're coming up, in a few days, to the 55th. anniversary of her death and this film was made to commemorate the 50th. anniversary.

Were you living there then Nick? I doubt it - I rather think maybe you were then in Oz.


Let the man be French (Charles Aznavour - who can get enough of him now he's gone?).

Let him sing some duets in French ...

Firstly with an old favourite - a very French woman who I'd almost forgotten that I loved in the 1980s - Mariel Mathieu:



Just a little more (I don't know her - Nolwenn Leroy - but she's good) ...


Friday, 5 October 2018

Charles Aznavour dies

Well, aged 94, and passing away in the bath, is my idea of Heaven. I loved the man (of Armenian origins) , his voice, the emotion and expression in his voice but before anything else lets hear his voice ...



And more ... an interview (nearly half an hour with the first minute or so in a foreign language):




Personally I prefer "Yesterday When I was Young" but have a look here and get six of the best (at the BBC).

I'm not keen on that Facebook-style thing of: RIP so I'll simply say ...

Thank you our Froggie friend.

Before you go ... there's more you need to know about Mr. Aznavour (especially if, unlike myself, you are Jewish). The linked article includes links to more songs.




Nowt as queer as folk (as is said, not just in Yorkshire)



Why are people so strange? (So peculiar and odd?)

Is it a coincidence that the word, "STRANGER" is almost identical to "strange"? Have you ever been treated like a stranger, when not (a stranger)?

The following is an outline of a public event that my wife and I attended yesterday - I won't name the event or location as it's irrelevant to this post which is about human beings and how they interact and why (should we ever establish why) they do the things they do that are so very distasteful.

Setting - let's just say that it was a literary event lasting a couple of hours (but we left a little before its scheduled finish).

People - event organised by a minor author with guest speakers that should have been 4 (including the organiser and 3 female authors of varying status/profile). One was absent, so three spoke briefly about themselves and then read out a chapter of one of their publications (typically from a book that they had written).

I half-predicted who might attend (turn up) and I got it fairly right. I used to attend a couple of writers' groups based in a large town adjacent to The Lincolnshire Wolds (he says, wondering slightly why he is being a little mysterious and elusive ...). The leaders (2) and their respective partners (2 - of course) were there. The leader of one group (the organiser of the event) whom I felt I had had a good straightforward relationship with, acted in, what I would say was an entirely normal way and indeed the second she spotted me arrive, she greeted me quite warmly, I felt, and we introduced our respective 'other halves'. - So no issues there ... We sat nearby the partner of the organiser and he was as one might hope for, chatty, open and warm (although I noticed that he 'disappeared' about halfway through - maybe to the venue's main bar?). - I wondered if it may, in any way, reflect his take on some of the attendees (which included the leader and partner of a 'competitive' local writers' group of whom I will write further in a moment).

Nearby where I and my wife were seated (towards the rear) were two ladies (woman and wife) of whom I knew, one being pretty much a regular at one of the writers' groups (that was uninvolved in this event's organisation). They too spoke quite easily and pleasantly and openly. Also, as I walked in, another of that group's attendees spotted me, said "hello" (reminded me of her name, which, embarrassingly, I had forgotten, as I had not attended that group for many months and never would I be returning, as I think all knew).

So here's the point:


In walks four people (rather later than virtually all others and a little after the event was due to start, (although it hadn't started). They are - the leader of other writers' group, a tall man aged about 65 with long, over-the-ears tightly-curled, if not 'permed', rather dishevelled hair, his partner (a woman) aged about 60, looking rather Civil Servant-like and serious-faced, followed by a group attendee (and I am certain, good social friend of the aforementioned couple) and, finally her rather 'neutral', amiable, easy-going (possibly long-suffering, I rather thought, whilst trying not to sound 'bitchy') other half. All four took in the room's contents, i.e. naturally taking in the human content rather more than the room's inanimate objects, I would assume. All four 'clocked' me and immediately (I mean in a flash - a nanosecond) turned away before I could even get a communication towards my vocal cords (should I be so inclined) to mouth the words "hello" or "hi" or maybe even wave hello. They either looked straight ahead or at the opposite wall or to the presentation area - anywhere but at me (or my wife). They acknowledged many others and spoke to a few as they grabbed seats as far away from me as possible, right at the front.

My wife commented afterwards how "gay" the man (the group leader) looked as he walked in, apparently, as she described, with his pelvic area forced a little forward of the rest of his body. He lived permanently with a woman, had children (I believe with another) and I had never had similar thoughts to my wife's observations and I had not seen his posture as she apparently did. - But her comments were thought-provoking certainly.

So, in case you didn't pick up on my account - I was being very very obviously shunned by at least the group leader, his partner and certainly their female friend. Regarding the female friend - she has a very unusual name - I won't share it - but if you heard it you may, like me, misunderstand the name and possibly misspell it too. I remember months earlier asking her about her name, explaining to her that I thought that it was different from what she subsequently told me it was - and I recall her utter disdain and her very dismissive body language which said to me "oh you wouldn't know would you ..." (indicating that she had me down as a 'nincompoop' and something of a lesser being. - This attitude purveyed through all three of these people I felt during my many months of attending that group and I tolerated it because I felt that I could get something out of the attendance there, rather despite of them. I didn't get much though - except maybe a lesson in tolerance of misplaced self-worth expressed by the organisers.

Not once during the one and a half hours did any of these three exchange so much as a fleeting glance in my direction, let alone any words of warmth or acknowledgemen (you have to remember that the couple that led the group had been guests in my house). I was being studiously and conspiratorially 'sent to Coventry' (as the saying goes).

For me, I noted all this odd, strange and stranger (in, of course, more than one sense) experience but even though somewhat saddened I was determined not to reveal any annoyance (as I rather think that they would have lapped that up). Instead I engaged in chatting to that majority around me that were 'normal', pleasant and amiable.

So the point of this post is to highlight a couple of things:

  1. Obviously that there's nowt as queer as folk or that there's maybe even more nowt as queer as folk.
  2. The curiosity that some behaviour presents in the person on the receiving end of that attempted marginalisation (that'll be me).
May I take a moment more of your time (Little Imaginary Reader - LIR) ? You, as you may recall used to be referred to as LLR (Little Lonely Reader) but one regular blog visitor got upset, told me so, with a lot of expletives, and then left, never to be seen again (or maybe he will come back when he's cooled-off).  You can read more about that scenario by looking under the label "Apologies".

So here's my question:

What don't they like about me? - Or what did I do that offended? - Or where did I go wrong? - I'll never actually know, but I do, and have, speculated of course ...

In my opinion they think that they form the local "Intelligentsia"; The crème de la crème intellectually and culturally of the Lincolnshire Middle Class. Maybe they see me as not a local - an incomer (even though they are somewhat too). Maybe they see me as an upstart. Who knows really (and does it even matter)?

What does perturb me though (and I see myself as an empathiser, even a sympathiser - as a type of person) - what drives anyone to be like this? - It's not nice. Some  might even say that it was very cruel (only if it upset me). It bemuses me rather than upsets me.

In conclusion: - NOT NICE PEOPLE are they? Comments?




The picture above may be fitting. - A group of delicate fairies (- no, not that kind - sweet little fluttery things full of openness and innocence) attracted in by the light of the candle but, they, being 'set-up' to burn and shrivel and die - an agonising death by the nasty people that lured them in for their own malicious, surreptitious benefit or dubious gratification - rather as I was when I joined a writers' group (that writers' group), attracted by what I may have thought was 'enlightenment'. I hope that you find that picture as thought provoking as I do ...









Monday, 1 October 2018

South Ormsby Hall (visit Saturday September 29th. 2018)



South Ormsby Hall is 'in private hands', owned by Mr. & Mrs. Jon and Jan Thornes and if one does simple Google searches regarding Mr. Thornes's background almost all of what one will find reflects his success in numerous businesses. My own description of the man that bought South Ormsby Hall and its 3,000 acre estate, lock stock & barrel (speculated at the price of between £20M/£25M) is that he represents "new money" compared to the last aristocratic 'squire' owner, Adrian Massingberd-Mundy (who died in 2012) who was 'old school' and 'old money'. I'm not saying either one is better than the other, just that their lifestyles are so very different (in my estimation).

As a "Friend Of South Ormsby" I was able to pay (only £5 per head) to visit the Hall and the gardens and our tour was led by Ms. Caron Ementon, a former Head Teacher but now working for The Estate as their Heritage Interpreter and Administrator. Her tour was very well organised, researched and presented and gave a great insight into the Estate's history.

Reading between the lines one picks-up locally that there is obviously some controversy over the plans that the relatively new owner has for The Estate which include the building of a quite large number of houses and the establishing of many businesses within The Estate. Personally, when I attended, some months ago, an exhibition, on Mr. Thornes's "Vision for the Future" I thought his plans were good and would sustain The Estate and probably ultimately make him a lot of money too (much of which he'll need to restore the Hall etc.). The only thing that puts people off the idea of making money is usually something called envy and I would guess that some opposition to his proposals relate to people that are envious of his success and potential further success. I speak as something of a natural anti-Tory as I am generally inclined, politically, to the left, but I am also of the view that old estates need to be viable and there's nothing wrong with enterprise in my book. He (Mr. Thornes) has already created a number of jobs at The Estate and some of his employees, if not all, will be tasked to be self-generating of the income that they are in receipt of. In other words, they'll need to earn their keep by bringing in more business (and businesses) to the whole operation - the brand. My only reservation is that I hope that the character and landscape - the look of The Estate - will not be jeopardised but enhanced.

The Hall is run-down and in need major renovation (some of which is already underway). It is described, I am sure, correctly, as Palladian architecture (I as a former London Blue Badge Guide did plenty of study on architectural styles) but to my mind it is not very typical. When I think of Andrea Palladio's style of architecture, I think of very grand classically-styled places like The White House (in The States), The Queen's House at Greenwich, Chiswick House in West London, and the most impressive building that I recall from my (West Country) tour guiding days was Prior Park (Ralph Allen's home) in Bath, none of which look at all like South Ormsby Hall (SOH), except perhaps in symmetry, but I reckon the differences are because SOH is red brick and not the more common stucco style of render that I associate with many grand Palladian buildings.

I took copious notes during my visit for my own interest and some of them are translated (and I mean really - deciphered) below in a random, non-prioritised, bulleted note form, I am fully aware that many points that one might wish to know, like dates of what occurred when, are absent, but I will add information as and when I can substantiate it:

  • Adrian Massingberd-Mundy (the Estate's former owner) resided with his partner - a woman by the name of Sara Perceval. She was a dress designer to many famous people like Shirley Bassey, Dame Barbara Cartland (who introduced the couple to each other) and Rod Stewart (although I guess for something other than dresses). They never married, nor had any children. Adrian's only sibling, his sister, too, had no children, hence the 'end of the line' as it were.
  • In The Hall is a photo by Tony Snowdon (Princess Margaret's high society photographer husband) of Sara Perceval. He allegedly said to her when presenting the photo "Rather glamorous - not like you at all, Sara." - Sounds to me exactly what he might have said by the way of a back-handed compliment (any documentaries one might catch that include him tend to reveal his sense of humour).
  • The primary architect of South Ormsby Hall was James Paine who also did parts of Chatsworth House
  • Peter Atkinson made some alterations at The Hall including adding the entrance doric-capital columns (that are in a poor way, one very obviously disintegrating, and requiring restoration urgently I would say).
  • William Kent (whom I was familiar with and whom I used to lecture many years ago at The National Maritime Museum where the incredibly ornate Royal Barge [that he designed] was housed) was also involved in some design aspects of South Ormsby Hall.
  • The Massingberds (c 1638) when they settled at The Estate were pioneering farmers introducing new ideas to agriculture. The owner's brother owned and resided at Gunby Hall (now owned by National Trust) about ten miles away near Skegness. their joint family estates covered hundreds of square miles of Mid Lincolnshire when at their peak in the 18th century.
  • The 18th. century family at South Ormsby - an outline is shown here.
  • Possibly the largest painting of note in The Hall is a portrait of Anne Blackall (wife of Charles Burrell Massingberd) by the well-known artist, Angelica Kaffmann - a founder member of the RA (Royal Academy of Art) London. To my mind, this (although most members of today's tour group agreed that the painting was highly out of proportion), is certainly a very valuable painting (along with many others) and bear in mind that the purchase of The Estate by Jon Thornes was "lock, stock and barrel" hence he acquired an unknown vast quantity of (in some cases) still to be catalogued, artifacts from paintings to library books to furniture so - a wealth of 'stock' still of indeterminate value to The Estate.
  • The staircase is carved by William Lumby and represents one of the finest Georgian staircases certainly found anywhere in the county of Lincolnshire.
  • Estate's Facebook page (I don't do FB by the way).
  • Historic England's listing here
  • William Oswald Massingberd (Rector) wrote a book entitled: History of the Parish of Ormsby-Cum-Ketsby in the Hundred of Hill and County of Lincoln. There is a copy in Louth Library and it can be commercially obtained here and here as well as other sources.
  • There's a lot of useful information at the Layers of History website here (that has connections with The South Ormsby Estate).
The information supplied by Ms. Ementon on our tour was vast and interestingly presented and regrettably much is missing from the above random list owing to the fact that walking whilst jotting is a somewhat daunting and difficult task.

I did take a video of the garden area (including one of the two Hall cats) but, as ever, the film was too big for Mr. Google to permit me uploading it - sorry! I may try to upload it to YouTube later on and provide a link here.

Here's some pictures (possibility of more being added from time to time):






Some reference points regarding the owner, Mr Jon Thornes, and of The South Ormsby Estate:

  • A business article here.
  • An article concerning the proposed gin distillery in Driby (part of The Estate as I understand it) is here
  • Lincolnshire Live article about the proposed new homes building on The Estate is here
  • Information on The Lincs Wolds website is here.
- Probably will be considered unrelated - but I thought I'd include it - an obituary of Hugh Massingberd (and at the time of writing I know not who he was, other than that he was The Telegraph's obituary writer (humour?), but with that Massingberd surname, I rather think that he will be, or was, related to the former owner of South Ormsby Estate - Mr Adrian Massingberd-Mundy.

Another reference to Hugh Massingberd here in an article. Note he also wrote many books including, in 1988, his book: Country houses and their owners.

This article (written just after the death of the previous incumbent in 2012) makes fascinating reading all about the family and even the will in some detail.