Saturday, 24 March 2018

Creating and developing character

This is a FutureLearn exercise:

Writing character

Regularly reviewing past work and any ideas or observations listed in your notebook can help you generate new ideas.
Look back at the possible story idea or ideas that you arrived at in The notebook habit, and review all other story and character ideas you have noted or started so far.
You may or may not have got very far with these but consider whether asking the ‘What if?’ question might help you to further develop any of them.
Choose one character and develop it by:
  • imagining more detail
  • making sure you've done any necessary research
  • asking some ‘What if?’ questions
  • imagining some of the reasons surrounding the character’s dress, behaviour, speech or actions.
Write a paragraph or two about this character in your notebook, on your blog or in a Word document. There’s no need to post itto FutureLearn .

The lady on the bus:

She wobbled slightly and squeezed her little chihuahua dog to her bosom as she 'touched in' exactly as the driver hit the accelerater and the bus lurched forwards. She was used to this on London buses; the drama of keeping balance whilst handling several manouvres simultaneously. With every passing year the process became more difficult but, as she put it - not bad for seventy eight. She'd been seventy eight way through her eighties.

Every driver on route one one three knew her, some dreading her, others willing her to reappear with her little bowed friend Sacha. She would talk constantly to drivers, passengers, even through the window to passers-by mostly mouthing outragious comments about their poor taste in clothing. She wore heavy make-up with the brightest of red lipstick, sometimes clown-like blusher, hair in a bun atop her head which carried her very round face with those wide green eyes. Her shoes were highly polished, heeled and often bowed too. Occasionally she wore seamed stockings and ridiculously short dresses that made her look like a pantomine dame or pier-end showgirl intermitently flashing her bloomers.


Developing a plot from basic information


Plot development (FutureLearn course) – my contribution for this exercise:
(Refer to previous post for what this is about.)

Why on bus?

She had no financial consideration to be on a bus rather than in her chauffeur-driven Bentley – she simply wanted the company – somebody to talk to.

Why dog & where going?

She took her dog everywhere with her. She was going nowhere in particular that day. She just jumped any bus going through St. John’s Wood where she had her penthouse flat.

Why did she look as she did?

She always had a lot of make-up and exquisitely painted nails and well-coiffeured blond hair. This was her ‘signature’ appearance.

Dogs red bow – why?

The dog always wore a matching bow – matching that is to her mistress's nail varnish.

FutureLearn (OU) creative writing course:
I am taking the free part of an OU course (it goes on longer but is then chargeable - but still pretty affordable). It lasts around 10 weeks as I recall and I am about halfway through and enjoying it immensely. It is easy to get distracted though - even by indulging in the comments board (forum) where students can intereact with each other. I have just had a break of  four or five days - so I'm anxious to get back to the course and writing. I attend in any case a separate writers' group once a week in Louth (Lincs/UK) - another enjoyable treat every Monday - and available more than that too - website: http://www.louthpoetrygroup.co.uk/

I have a FutureLearn (OU) task to do:

Copy/paste:

Developing your plot line


Developing the detail of your character will help you arrive at your story. And discovering causality – what causes your character to do things or to be the way they are – will give you plot. But how do you develop that plot?
Returning to the example:
‘A woman on the bus today carried her Pekinese dog inside her handbag. It had a red bow on its head that matched her sweater.’
Now consider:
  • Why was she on the bus?
  • Why did she have the dog and where was she taking it?
  • Why did she look the way she did?
  • Why did the dog have a red bow?
Have a look at my next post to see what I've written-up

Tuesday, 20 March 2018

Feedback guidelines for Grazia Rita (copied & pasted into this blog post)

For you Grazia Rita:


 Start Writing Fiction

Commenting on the work of fellow writers 

Reading and offering feedback on the work of fellow writers can be enjoyable and inspiring, but there are some pitfalls that you may be able to avoid by being aware of them from the start. First of all, it is important not to be so worried about getting it wrong or so afraid of hurting the writer that you offer only praise or superficial comments. One of the considerable benefits of creative writing study is that you can get feedback from someone other than your mother, husband, best friend or sister. Be sincere and constructive. Support your fellow writers by trying to help their work become the best it can be rather than by protecting them in the short term. 

While being honest, take care not to be dismissive. Even in the rawest of drafts, there may be a glimmer of something that will become good in subsequent drafts. The whole point of offering feedback is to be able to openly discuss unfinished, sometimes even embryonic work. Reading can be as intense and passionate an experience as writing. Sometimes fellow writers may explore controversial topics that trespass on your personal values or feelings. Remember that if you feel disturbed by another writer’s work, this may be precisely the kind of response they were aiming for. 

If a piece of writing offends you, you can state this truthfully without blaming the writer and then try to evaluate the piece objectively. For example: ‘I have to say that I found your satirical portrayal of mental illness and its treatment very jarring as it seemed to me to ridicule the patients and showed all of the medical staff as monstrous. But in terms of what you’re trying to do, satirising the system, this is a savage and uncompromising piece. Also, your main characterisation of the woman is distinct and goes beyond satire, by contrast to the rest of the piece and the other characters; she is not stereotypical at all.’ 

If you continue to find a piece of writing upsetting and unacceptable, you have the right not to read it and not to comment on it. Never assume that writings are strictly autobiographical, even if they appear to be so. One of the basic tenets of Start writing fiction is that you may draw on your memories, life and experiences in inventive ways, but you will also write convincingly about things which have
never happened directly to you. It is important not to inhibit each other by asking intrusive questions like ‘Do you have a mother-in-law like that?’ or ‘Were you anorexic, then?’ 

Here are some feedback guidelines:   • If you are asked to focus on three aspects of the writing – don’t forget to address those specific issues. • If you think an aspect of the writing works well, try to analyse why, but also look for its faults. Usually there will be some.   • If you think an aspect of the writing doesn’t work, again, analyse why. Make sure you look for the parts that might be working better in the piece. Almost always there will be positive things to focus on as well.  • Try to go beyond ‘Oh, I liked that, but I didn’t like that.’  • Always comment on the idea and its implementation, not on the surmised personality of the writer.  • Bear in mind that, more often than not, you will be passing comment on a ‘work-in-progress’, a piece of writing that is not finished. Try to assess where it might go and what tactics might be used in its development.  • Always try to show evidence for whatever claims you make. Evidence, in this instance, is the part of the writing you are talking about. Point out the use of language you are focused on so that the writer knows which part you mean.  • Rather than being imperious in your comments, explain what you mean, point out the evidence – but also freely suggest there may be other opinions. This can be done with little nudging queries: ‘I wonder if anyone else thinks this?’  • Think about how well the writing is geared to its intended readership. 


Receiving comments on your work  Receiving feedback on your work from your fellow writers can be confusing. Your initial impulse may often be to try to explain and defend your writing – possibly by email or in the course discussion/comments. This impulse is natural but can sabotage the possibility and proper effect of illuminating feedback. Try to be calm and curious and give yourself time to sift and reflect. Everyone loves praise and validation and these can encourage writers tremendously, but so-called ‘negative’ feedback can occasionally be a great gift too when it mobilises your imagination or offers you some fresh insight into your writing. 

It is equally important not to rush into redrafting. Wait and deliberate. Never redraft immediately after getting the first comment on a piece of work. All suggestions may be welcome but don’t try to implement every one of them. You are not trying to satisfy a tribunal or produce some kind of ‘writing by committee’. With practice you will develop two things – an emotional robustness regarding comments on your work and the power to discriminate between suggestions that are useful to you and those that are genuinely wrong-headed or unsuitable. 

Here are some guidelines:  • When assessing comments you may wish to rewrite the idea completely. Don’t rush into this.  • You may wish to tweak your story a little, rewrite completely or just leave it as it is. Any of these options is possible. There is no correct way of responding to critical comments. You may choose to accept some comments and reject others. Remember: you are the final arbiter; you are the writer.  • If you are lucky and receive more than one lot of feedback, pay special attention to areas where there seems to be a consensus of opinion, even though it might be an opinion with which you strongly disagree. Ask yourself: ‘Have I ever had doubts about this before I got these comments?’ Be honest with yourself. If the answer is ‘Yes’, then the area almost certainly needs attention – even if it happens to be your favourite section.  • Ask yourself whether the piece under discussion is going to be developed any further. If so, how?  • If it isn’t going to be developed, what can be salvaged from it? You might wish to use a character, a metaphor, a line of dialogue. It’s important to realise that even if you eventually abandon an idea, there may be some small part of that idea – sometimes just an image, a line or even a phrase– that you can use at a later date, in another piece.  • Remember: your fellow writers are commenting on a piece of work at a particular stage in its development, not on a finished article, and they are certainly not commenting on you personally. 

If approached in the right way, sharing your writing and passing comment about the work of other writers can be rewarding. It can dramatically boost your development as a writer, because, if only temporarily, it drags you out from the necessary isolation that accompanies the act of writing. In those brief illuminating interludes you will gain insights that might otherwise take you months, if not years, of solitary redrafting and editing. It is a rare opportunity, one that should be grasped. After all, it’s not every day that you have guaranteed readers, readers
who will pay meticulous attention to detail and who have a mutual interest in offering constructive criticism.

(Copy/paste ends)

A review of the story submitted by Grazia Rita (FutureLearn)

This post has one objective - to give Grazia Rita her review of her work (FutureLearn) so below is a copy/paste of the details that I saved from the review I did (but it somehow got 'lost').

Copy/paste starts here (sorry about odd layout and tiny fonts but that was how it ended-up):


How was the central character portrayed and was this portrayal clear and interesting? The central character was very interestingly portrayed. The descriptions and situation was very clear. This is one of the best pieces of writing I have seen so far & I have reviewed about seven I think (so Far). Well done.

What made you think this piece was a story and did you want to read on? How could one not think that this was a story? It had all the necessary ingredients:

It flowed naturally - it had a start, middle and 'twisty' end. Yes of course I wanted to read on and did.

What were the most, and least, successful aspects of the writing?

Most successful aspect(s):

The very natural flow of the story - very easy to read whilst still being interesting if simple in its approach. A bit of mystery gently portrayed.

Least:

Humm - that's a tough one really ... let's think... I suppose, as a male reviewer I might feel slightly guilty for what I am about to say - but the descriptions of the man (interviewer etc.) were a bit 'girly' which I hope that you know what I mean by that.

(Note: my wife and I love your home country - Italy - we visit as often as we can - and I think its one of the great Italian characteristics that people speak and react openly and naturally on the whole - love that - so don't be hurt by the 'girly' comment!)

Copy/paste ends.
Don't worry about the attribution (the name) shown on my blog - I think that you'll guess what's going on with it.

Monday, 19 March 2018

Second section of Untitled


I suddenly had a thought. Why am I telling you all this? Oh yes I remember, I got this weird job that you interviewed me for, that of narrator in some kind of... is it a play about how cruel life was in years gone by for anyone exposed to society’s mental health ‘solutions’?

This new thing called Google – well it’s bloody amazing. Who would ever have guessed that the bloke that ‘invented’ Cane Hill mental hospital was a bloody Mr. Moody... for fuck’s sake is that a wind-up or what? I dare not read any more of the stuff about mental hospitals, despite my new role. I just cannot keep a straight face. The Commissioners for Lunacy found some architect who almost had a good name too, not Mr. Howl, but almost – Mr. Howell. Imagine going to dinner at a friend’s house and doing a bit of networking; that thing that was once ‘mingling’. Then people saying oh what line are you in? That’s how people used to ask – there was even a show once on TV called What’s my Line? – And then you just come out with it, real cool and casual...I’m a Commissioner for Lunacy.

Jesus – follow that – what a conversation stopper. – Wonder if that job ever got guessed on What’s My Line?

Sorry, been told to stop here. Apparently my brief was to tell you this stuff in 350 words max and I’ve blown it – lost the bloody job too – apparently, so the text says:

Please desist. Kindly relinquish your position with immediate effect. A severance of £250 has been paid directly into your bank account and we thank you for your contributions but we have concluded that you are likely to generate the same level of attention from the legal profession as Mr. Hislop of Private Eye.

An untitled piece of work in two sections (this is the first)


She’d spent some time in the now closed Cane Hill Hospital. This type of hospital was once called an asylum which contrasts somewhat with the modern day concept of someone seeking asylum as nobody in their right mind wanted to be in an asylum. Actually very few out of their right mind volunteered but now ‘the world and his dog’ seeks asylum... and who would blame them I hear you say. I’m not trivialising here or being a jerk; I just find myself in this role as narrator. I didn’t ask for it; it was thrust upon me by you – yes you, my new boss – my employer.

Why have I been sectioned out? – Ah that reminds me - I was introduced to her some time back in nineteen forty nine when I was in a Moses basket and far too young to appreciate that she, my ‘white’ aunty - well that was my childhood name for her, was incarcerated... did I get that wrong? Is the word incinerated?... In the aforementioned establishment on and off, several times, after she was, er... also sectioned, but not out - rather in, I would say.

South Londoners who went ‘off their rocker’ would often end up in Cane Hill or maybe The Maudsley. This is mental illness that we’re talking about here –

R E S P E C T – not dissing about here but I have been asked by you, yes you, to be amusing here but that puts me in a dangerous position. I don’t want nutters, current, former or future, chasing me down the road for some allied mental equivalent to homophobia, agoraphobia or any other bloody phobia. I embrace mental health. I am very far from being mental myself; although I was once described as being ‘on the spectrum’ which some misconstrue to be a mental thing but I take as a compliment as my mother always said that labels were important. Her? - She likes Versace, Gucci, Ferrari – and, er, obviously, Spectrum; Mum’s always right.

My aunt Blanche – white aunty, was a very interesting, if manic person. She was... oh I didn’t say did I? Yes she passed a long time ago poor love, so how bloody unfair is this of me? – She isn’t even around to sue me for libel or the opposite - defend any of my commentary or should I better say, my narrative.

She did survive being thrown from a New York window and indeed her American ex-husband pretty much paid for her house in Dulwich. She dolled-out this window stuff repeatedly over the years. The latter is certainly true, but the former, I doubt as I’ve never heard of any Big Apple bungalows.

Monday, 12 March 2018

What's it all about?

Hi - WELCOME!

If you've managed to arrive here I've maybe sent you a link or somehow you Googled something that landed you here either directly or indirectly. So as you've worked so hard to arrive - what's it all about?

I mean this blog... what's it all about?

Firstly some background...

I have run a blog before, I do have a website or three and I do have I.T. knowledge but I can't say that I find the whole 'cyberbabble' (or is it 'cyberbubble') easy or user-friendly so getting here, for me, wasn't a 'walk in the park' so if you too find some aspects of getting around computing, The Internet and well, blogging 'awkward', great - you're in good company!

If, however, you are some kind of expert and got here in a flash - good for you.

So, as threatened, here IS what's it all about?

Over the last few months in particular (that's 2017/18) and over an adult's lifetime more generally, I have found or rediscovered that I can write. That sounds pretty confident and yes I am, but that confidence has only just arrived. Why? Simple, I have written quite a few short stories and am part way through two novels (one at least of which will probably get finished, whether published or not) and that recent output is as a result of belonging to writing groups. My short stories get better all the time and one that I wrote a few days ago was I thought very good and a few friends agreed.

So, initially and primarily this blog is about my writing but, knowing me, no doubt I'll stray here and there as I am quite a thinker and sometimes quite outspoken and fairly politically-minded - so watch out!

As you'll see, this is my first blog, so be patient with me if things go wrong or seem wrong.

I welcome comments - goodness only knows if the way this is set-up will allow that (yet)! Oh, well done Tim - you checked - yes comments are enabled. I might try commenting myself just to check...