Copy/paste starts here (sorry about odd layout and tiny fonts but that was how it ended-up):
How was the central character portrayed and was this
portrayal clear and interesting? The
central character was very interestingly portrayed. The descriptions and
situation was very clear. This is one of the best pieces of writing I have seen
so far & I have reviewed about seven I think (so Far). Well done.
What made you think this piece was a story and did you want
to read on? How
could one not think that this was a story? It had all the necessary
ingredients:
It flowed naturally - it had a start, middle and 'twisty'
end. Yes of course I wanted to read on and did.
What were the most, and least, successful aspects of the
writing?
Most successful aspect(s):
The very natural flow of the
story - very easy to read whilst still being interesting if simple in its
approach. A bit of mystery gently portrayed.
Least:
Humm - that's a tough one really
... let's think... I suppose, as a male reviewer I might feel slightly guilty
for what I am about to say - but the descriptions of the man (interviewer etc.)
were a bit 'girly' which I hope that you know what I mean by that.
(Note: my wife and I love your
home country - Italy - we visit as often as we can - and I think its one of the
great Italian characteristics that people speak and react openly and naturally
on the whole - love that - so don't be hurt by the 'girly' comment!)
Copy/paste ends.
Don't worry about the attribution (the name) shown on my blog - I think that you'll guess what's going on with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment